Martingale versus Paris Strategies

  • News
Home News Martingale versus Paris Strategies

Gokkers love casino strategies. There is virtually no table or card game in which players do not use some strategy. The use of a good strategy can mean the difference between profit and loss. No professional player will take a seat behind the Blackjackt table or the roulette without a strategy.

There are dozens of strategies for playing casino games. Some can be used in multiple games, others limit themselves to a single game. The two most popular gambling systems are the Martingale And the Paroli strategy. Both systems have been used for centuries and have very specific properties.

In this article you can read about the differences between the two strategies and which strategy is ultimately the most recommended.

Marting versus Paroli History

The American mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal (1623 to 1662) was the creator of a large number of gambling strategies.

It is possible that Pascal invented both the Martingale and the Paroli strategy. This, whether or not together with his colleague Pierre de Fermat. Historians agree that he and Pierre de Fermat have developed the probability science. They did this through well -documented letters. That early correspondence between Pascal and Fermat was possibly the basis of modern game theory.

Game theory historians trace the principles back to the beginning of the 18th century. However, Pascal and Fermat were interested in many more gambling strategies. They may therefore be at the basis of more well -known strategies.

Modern game theory predicts the possible outcomes of simple situations. The 20th-century mathematician John Von Neumann is seen as the founder of the first formal rules for modern game theory.

Game strategies such as the Martingale and Paroli do not resemble the classic strategies. They are rather based on the question of how chant In a gambling game can be enlarged. That is the essence of game theory and it is a suitable way to describe gambling systems.

Why a strategy?

Professional gamblers will see this as a rhetorical question. Often stated by people who are not professionally involved in gambling. There are just as many reasons to use gambling strategies as there are people who make bets.

The main reason to use a system is to beat the unfavorable opportunities of the game. At casino games the house always has an advantage. The opportunities for payment are not the same as the opportunities you have to win.

In other words, you always lose in the long term, because the house wins slightly more often than the player. It depends on the game, but let's take the European roulette as an example.

When deploying on even or odd, red or black, High/Low you have a mathematical chance of 48.6% that you win. However, to play right, that should be 50%.

A strategy cannot change the opportunities for payment. The aim of a strategy is to improve the return by playing strategically. For example, by increasing or lowering your bets. You could also say that by using a strategy, you try to limit your loss.

We already saw that you always lose in the long term. If this is the case, then it is of course better to lose as little as possible. But you don't always lose. So a strategy can also be aimed at winning as much as possible at times when you win.

The idea behind every gambling system is that your profits ultimately rise higher than your loss.

Always the same opportunities

Whether you use the Martingale or the Paroli strategy, you still have a disadvantage in the game while playing. How big that disadvantage is varies per game. The following games can be played with both strategies:

Although Blackjack requires certain skills, it is still a game of chance. That means that you cannot predict what the next card is that the dealer draws. If you could make such predictions, the house would not allow you to play blackjack. The greater the randomness, the smaller the opportunities that you win.

Martingale strategy

The Martingale strategy is better known among gamblers than the Paroli strategy. It is also a very simple strategy and therefore easy to learn.

The Martingale is also independent. You can use it in any gambling scenario. The only condition is that a series of game rounds follows each other.

The strategy depends on the height of deployment. The strategy is based on the minimum table deployment. With the Martingale strategy, the player simply plays with this minimal bet. He does not adjust it as long as it is won.

However, when a game round is lost, the player doubles his commitment. And he keeps doing that, until another round is won. In that case, all the earlier loss has been made up again and the basic deployment will be played again.

Disadvantages Martingale

There are two important disadvantages of the Martingale strategy. The first is the table limit in combination with a long series of losing play rounds. When this happens, one will no longer be able to double at a certain moment. A second disadvantage is that the amounts can rise quickly, so that at a certain moment you have to use more than your bankroll is large.

You either have no money anymore if you continue to increase your bets (if you end up in a losing series), or you walk against the table limit, so you have to stop increasing.

To speak strategically

Dparoli strategy is often called the inverted Martingale. Instead of increasing bets after losing you, you increase your bet on profit. The strategy assumes that you can earn more money by taking advantage of a winning series.

However, it is a careful strategy. When one has doubled three times, the original base deployment is switched back.

So nothing happens in the event of a loss, and when winning, doubling is doubled. This is done a maximum of three times and then people go back to the basic deployment.

Nadeel van paroli

The disadvantage of this strategy is that people do not optimally benefit from a winning series. After all, after three times the basic deployment is switched back. Suppose you win 40 game rounds in a row, you will win, increase, increase and start again.

What if you had continued to increase during that winning series until the table limit was reached? The Paroli strategy is not a good strategy for people who can hardly adhere to a strategy. After all, they will not be inclined to switch back.

Advantage compared to Martingale strategy

Because you never know how long a winning or losing series will be, the Paroli strategy is a more conservative strategy.

In other words, your money will last longer when you use the paroli. Some see it as a disadvantage that the Paroli strategy never reaches the table limit. However, this is the power of this strategy.

The Martingale strategy has the theoretical advantage that it pays very well for high bets. But only when you win of course.

Long winning series are rare

Of course it is possible that the roulette ends up on red 40 times in succession. And of course you could get a Natural Blackjack ten times at Blackjack. But the chance that this will happen is very small. Winning series are quite common, but never lasts so long in practice.

Because winning series are often short -lived, both strategies never actually offer full profit.


Anyone who likes risk and the possible higher rewards will probably feel better with the Martingale. A lot of guts are needed, but the yield can be a considerable amount. It must then be kept that this huge amount is the loss from earlier laps.

If you are a more careful player, the Paroli strategy is a better choice. However, neither of the strategies guarantees that you leave the game with more money than you started. Try both strategies to see which best fits your playing style. By one Legal Casino You can try out the strategies online for free