Casino Care Office ’loses an appeal LegalNederlandscasino.nl

At the end of April, the Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden rejected the appeal on the withdrawn subsidy against the municipality of Almelo of Nina B, the former director of the "Casino care agency" Victorie.

The appeal that Nina B. had filed against the municipality of Almelo was about whether the former director of "Casino care agency" has acted unlawfully towards the municipality regarding subsidy.

The Zorgbureau was discredited in 2018 after it turned out that the management appropriate itself exorbitant fees. The then director Nina B was accused of using huge amounts from the company for personal purposes, for example to gamble at casinos. Moreover, it also came to light that they too casinos Visited with the same people in need of help for which the subsidy was intended, among other things.

For this reason, the municipality of Almelo decided to reclaim $ 670,000 in subsidy money from the Zorgbureau at an earlier stage.

After research, it appeared that in the period from 1 January 2016 to 18 September 2018 a total of $ 561,500 in Pintransactie were done in casinos that could be traced back to Nina B. and the "Casino Zorgbureau" Victorie. The former director was unable to prove that she had used her equity for the casino visits.

A few transfers had been made from her private account to the account of the Zorgbureau. The amounts deposited were not in proportion to the amount issued. Moreover, Nina B. has not given any insight into her equity.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the director of a care institution has a duty to have the administration in order, and not least because it was about community money.

Former director "Casino care agency" Victorie has acted unlawfully

Since Nina B. PGB money used for, among other things, private visits to a casino, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden court ruled that Nina B. acted unlawfully. The Court of Appeal also ruled that the municipality of Almelo suffered damage because the former director has made unlawful use of community funds.

Because Nina B did not provide enough evidence to be able to prove the opposite, the Court of Appeal has ratified the earlier judgment of the court. Nina B. will have to take on all costs of the appeal because it has been unsuccessful by the Court. The details about this case can be found on Rechtspraak.nl.

To play safely, go to one American online casino with license!